Legal Opinion

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1976No. Civ. 48081PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALLPORT, J.

Petitioner, the compensation insurer, contends that respondent Norma Jo Bate, the applicant in the underlying compensation proceeding, was not an employee at the time of her injury.

The compensation judge characterized her as a “substitute” employee and held her injury compensable by analogy to Laeng v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., 6 Cal.3d 771 [100 Cal.Rptr. 377, 494 P.2d 1]. The appeals board concurred without further comment.

The evidence as to respondent’s employment status consisted entirely of her testimony and a report of earnings supplied by the alleged employer,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Sumner v. EdmundsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. McBurney v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Usher v. American Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Spradlin v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Mitchell v. Ed HizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Jones v. Jay Truck Driver Training Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API