Legal Opinion

Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1972No. L. A. 29942PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*774Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

While participating in the “obstacle course” phase of a physical agility test conducted by the City of Covina as part of a “tryout” competition for the position of “refuse crew worker,” petitioner John Laeng fell from a raised, horizontal telephone pole and severely fractured his right foot. Laeng sought compensation for his injuries under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, but the referee, although sympathetic to the “equities” of Laeng’s claim, concluded that the claimant was precluded from a workmen’s compensation recovery since, at the time of the injury, he had not yet…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Lotspeich v. Chance Vought AircraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Edwards v. Hollywood CanteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In-Home Supportive Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Arriaga v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Snyder v. Michael's Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API