McBurney v. Indus. Accident Comm'n
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review an order of the respondent commission denying compensation to the petitioner.
In January, 1932, the petitioner applied to the bureau of county welfare of the county of Los Angeles for assistance. After due investigation he was found to be a resident of the county and entitled to the relief sought. His requirements were fixed at $41.60 per month. From that time until April 11, 1933, he was given aid through the county welfare department. That aid took various forms. He was given groceries at irregular intervals from January 21, 1932, until April 11,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vaivida v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Zoulalian v. New England Sanatorium & Benevolent Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Thurston Co. Chap. Amer. Etc. v. Dept. L. I.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Thurston County Chapter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Edwards v. Hollywood CanteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- County of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Arriaga v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- County of Los Angeles v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Oklahoma City v. CapleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.