Legal Opinion
Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1966No. L. A. 28984PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
James Egan, a California resident, suffered an industrial injury at Mercury, Nevada, while employed as a structural ironworker by Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Company, Inc., hereinafter called Reynolds. The Industrial Accident Commission (the commission) 2 awarded Egan workmen’s compensation benefits for his injury. Reynolds seeks to annul the award, contending that the commission had no jurisdiction over Egan’s claim. The primary question presented is whether the commission correctly found that the contract of employment between Egan and Reynolds was executed in California. We conclude…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bowers v. American Bridge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor LunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Travelers Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.