Legal Opinion

Sumner v. Edmunds

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1933No. Docket No. 785PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

Respondent had judgment against appellants Edmunds and Fresno Republican Publishing Company, a corporation, for and on account of personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident which occurred near the city of Fresno on December 17, 1929. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and from a judgment rendered against them said defendants have taken this appeal.

The facts may be summarized as follows: Appellant Edmunds was employed by Fresno Republican Publishing Company, a corporation, to deliver papers; respondent wished to work for the publishing company, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Lyttle v. MontoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Knutson Ex Rel. Knutson v. LurieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API