Legal Opinion
Madrid Corp. v. Inland Wetlands Agency
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 13, 1991No. 9759PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment denying its appeal from the decision of the defendant1 *447inland wetlands agency of the town of Mansfield (agency) denying the plaintiff’s application for a permit to conduct regulated activities within 150 feet of an inland wetlands.
The defendant agency regulates the wetlands and watercourses, as well as adjoining buffer areas of 150 feet, in the town of Mansfield.2 On May 17, 1989, the plaintiff filed an application with the defendant to deposit fill material on land that slopes down to a wetlands. The parcel is approximately four acres and is owned by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Gagnon v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Kaeser v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoffman v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Manatuck Associates v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Eureka v. v. Inland Wetlands Board, No. Cv00-033 93 51 S (Aug. 31, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Forsell v. Conservation Commission, No. 31 67 98 (Mar. 31, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Herman v. Redding Conservation Commission, No. 31 43 27 (Aug. 18, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.