Legal Opinion
Kaeser v. Conservation Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 5, 1989No. 7383PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the conservation commission of the town of Easton acting as the local inland wetlands agency. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred in failing to articulate its reasons for affirming the commission’s decision to deny their application and in failing to find that the commission had acted arbitrarily by disregarding substantial expert evidence. We find no error.
In September, 1986, the plaintiffs applied to the defendant commission for permission to construct a new single-family…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- City of Norwich v. Norwich Fire FightersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Klug v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Obeda v. Board of SelectmenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
3Cited by35 opinions
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Gagnon v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Sowin Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Eagan v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Bradley v. Inland Wetlands AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.