Legal Opinion

Manatuck Associates v. Conservation Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 1, 1992No. 10538; 10539PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

These are consolidated appeals, brought by Elizabeth M. Gaynor and other neighboring property owners (neighbors), from the decision of the trial court sustaining in part and dismissing in part two *782appeals from the decision of the defendant conservation commission of the town of Fairfield (commission).1 The first appeal challenges the trial court’s reversal of the commission’s denial of Manatuck Associates’ application for a permit to conduct regulated activities on eight lots in a proposed ten lot subdivision. The second appeal challenges the trial court’s affirmance of the commission’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  5. Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Forsell v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Lord Family of Windsor, LLC v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Three Levels Corp. v. Conservation Commission of ReddingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  4. Cornacchia v. Environmental Protection CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. State v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API