Legal Opinion

Steen v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 3, 2005No. Slip Op. 05-131; Court 04-00623PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACH, Judge.

I

Introduction

This case challenges the Department of Agriculture’s (“Agriculture”) definition of “net farm” or “net fishing” income pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 2401e(a)(l)(C) (2004). On August 23, 2005, the court held oral argument on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted (“Defendant’s’ Motion”). The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 2395 (2005). For the following reasons Defendant’s Motion is granted.

II

Background

On November 6, 2003, the Foreign Agricultural Service (“FAS”) certified that Pacific Salmon…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United States Sec'y of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  2. Viet Do v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. Guangzhou Maria Yee Furnishings, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  4. Cabana v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  5. Wooten v. United States, Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API