Anderson v. United States Sec'y of Agriculture
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
Plaintiff Robert L. Anderson challenges the decision of the Foreign Agricultural Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (hereinafter “Agriculture” or the “USDA”) denying his application for benefits under the trade adjustment for farmers program 1 (“TAA program”). Plaintiff claims that Agriculture’s decision improperly failed to recognize the actual accrual basis decline in his net farm income for 2002. The court finds that the USDA entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem presented, see Motor Vehicle Mfs. Ass’n of U.S. v. State Farm…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Williams v. Board of ReviewIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Lady Kim T. Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Anderson v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Dus & Derrick, Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.