Legal Opinion
Viet Do v. United States Secretary of Agriculture
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 28, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-29; Court 05-00062PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion for judgment on the agency record brought by Plaintiffs Than Viet Do and Binh Thi Nguyen pursuant to USCIT R. 56.1. Plaintiffs contest the United States Secretary of Agriculture’s (“Agriculture”) determination denying their application for trade adjustment assistance (“TAA”).
Agriculture denied Plaintiffs’ application for TAA because their net fishing income did not decline from 2001 to 2002. Specifically, Plaintiffs’ fishing business lost less money in 2002 than it did in 2001. Plaintiffs do not contend that their net…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Glenn Paul Baker, Sr., Cross-Appellant v. Raymond International, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Homer Ramsdell Transportation Co. v. La Compagnie Générale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Ralli v. TroopSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ron Steen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Dus & Derrick, Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Wooten v. United States, Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Dorsey v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Dorsey v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.