Legal Opinion
Cabana v. United States Secretary of Agriculture
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 28, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-27; Court 04-00634PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff, Larry Cabana (“Cabana”) moves pursuant to USCIT R. 56.1 for judgment upon the agency record. Cabana contends that the United States Secretary of Agriculture (“Secretary” or “Department”) erred in determining that he was ineligible for certification to receive trade adjustment assistance (“TAA”) benefits. Specifically, Cabana asserts that he is eligible for TAA certification because his net fishing income in 2002 was less than his 2001 net fishing income. The Department responds that 19 U.S.C. § 2401e (c) grants the power to determine “net farm income”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Timex V.I., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lady Kim T. Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Lady Kim T. Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Wooten v. United States, Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Whitney Bros. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007