Legal Opinion
Wooten v. United States, Secretary of Agriculture
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 6, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-101; Court 05-00208PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
Introduction
This matter comes before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“Defendant’s Motion”) filed on January 18, 2006, and Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment Upon Agency Record (“Plaintiffs Motion”) filed on February 22, 2006. Plaintiff has failed to establish the facts necessary to warrant his eligibility for trade adjustment assistance benefits. Defendant’s Motion is granted and Plaintiffs Motion is denied. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 2395 (2004).
II
Background
On November 25, 2003, the Foreign Agriculture Service (“FAS”) approved the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Den Hoed v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Den Hoed v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Hoed v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Whitney Bros. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007