Legal Opinion

Rolland Frères (Inc.) v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 26, 1922No. 2135PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

"Tams,” crowns, hats, hat braids, “ all-over” braids, bands, strips, sheets, flowers, and ornaments, some made of a material called "visca” and others of "cellophane,” were classified by the collector of customs either as filaments of artificial silk or as articles composed in chief value of yarns, threads, filaments, or fibers-of artificial silk. The articles classified as “ artificial silk in the form of filaments,” were assessed for duty at 35 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 319 of the tariff act of 1913, and those classified as composed in chief value of yarns, threads, filaments, or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  3. Schoenemann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
  4. Strauss & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. Veit, Son & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Isler v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. Ringk v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Robert E. Landweer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API