Legal Opinion

Robert E. Landweer & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 27, 1964No. C.D. 2448PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, Judge:

The question presented herein is a novel one, being the first time the court has been called upon to interpret paragraph 1313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 since its amendment by Public Law 85-645, 72 Stat. 602, T.D. 54676. Said paragraph, as amended, reads, so far as is pertinent herein, as follows:

As used in this title, the term “rayon or other synthetic textile”, means any fiber, filament, or fibrous structure, and any band or strip (suitable for the manufacture of textiles) not over one inch in width, all the foregoing whether formed by extrusion or by other processes from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Veit, Son & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Rolland Frères (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Judson-Sheldon & Pacific Wood Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Atlantic Linen Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  4. Young v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API