Legal Opinion

Strauss & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 12, 1911No. 419PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7047 (T. D. 30725)..

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Gallilith combs imported at the port of New York were, by reason of their similitude to horn combs and in virtue of the provisions of paragraph 481 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, assessed for duty by the collector of customs at 50 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 463, the part of which material to the case reads as follows:

463. * * * Combs, composed wholly of horn, or composed of horn and metal, fifty per centum ad valorem.

The importers in due time and form protested that the merchandise was not dutiable as assessed and among other grounds of protest, which it is unnecessary to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Cerecedo Hermanos Y CompañiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. G. Falk & BrotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Komada & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Isler v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Allied Food Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Nevin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. Rolland Frères (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API