United States v. Veit, Son & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8064 (T. D. 37188). [Oral argument Deo. II, 1917, by Mr. Baldwin, Mr. Sharretts, and Mr-, washburn.]
1Opinion of the CourtMaetiN, Judge
This appeal, as impliedly limited by appellant’s brief, relates to certain trimmings, some of which are fringes composed in chief value of bullions, the others being narrow strips composed in. chief value of lame or lahn. It may-here be stated that,-.“lame”,and “lahn” are simply different names for the same article, the one word issuing from the French, the other from the German .language. -The goods were imported under the tariff act of-1913.
The collector assessed duty upon the merchandise at the rate of 60 per centum ad valorem, under the provision for “trimmings * * * of.whatever yarns,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. MeadowsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- True Fit Waterproof Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Horstman Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Siegman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
3Cited by20 opinions
- Isler v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Rolland Frères (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Chester Tricot Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Calhoun, Robbins & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.