Legal Opinion

United States v. Borgfeldt

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 19, 1926No. 2749PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Graham, Presiding Judge,

delivered tbe opinion.of the court:

On March 20,-1924, the appellee imported at New York certain oriental wool rugs. The testimony, together with an inspection of the official sample, shows the imported articles to. be oblong, each *241about 3 yi by 5 34 feet in size. They are made and in chief value of a foundation material of felted goat wool, pounded and pressed together, without further manufacturing process. About the margin of the rug the fibers of which it is composed are drawn out into a fringe from 2 to 4 inches in length. The rugs are ornamented with embroidered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kayser & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Veit, Son & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Rolland Frères (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Robert E. Landweer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Menchaca v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Penn v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  5. W. X. Huber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API