Legal Opinion

Schoenemann v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 15, 1903No. 11PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, William C. Schoenemann, imported’into the port of Philadelphia, in September, 1897, merchandise consisting of shells. The marine animal had been taken from the shells and the shells themselves cleansed, by being put into a tub with chloride of lime and then washed with clean water, in order to remove all animal matter, dirt, and offensive smell. The importer claimed that these shells were free from duty, under paragraph 635, part of the free list of the tariff act of 1897 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1686], which reads as follows:

“Pearl, mother of, and shells,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Frazee v. MoffittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1882
  3. United States v. MerckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
  4. United States v. GodwinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Isler v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. United States v. NeumanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  5. Allied Food Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API