Justesen's Food Stores, Inc. v. City of Tulare
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
This action was brought in the superior court to obtain an injunction against the enforcement of three certain sections of a city ordinance. A general demurrer to the plaintiff’s first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend, and judgment was entered tliereon, dismissing the action. This appeal followed.
The following allegations of fact, admitted to be true for the purposes of this appeal by the general demurrer of the defendants, upon which judgment was entered, appear in the plaintiff’s amended complaint: On August 15, 1939, the defendants City of Tulare and City Council of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ex parte WhitwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- In Re SumidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Clemons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Broadbent v. GibsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Spindler Realty Corp. v. MonningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Thain v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Daniel v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.