Legal Opinion

Broadbent v. Gibson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1943No. 6427PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court vacating an alternative writ of prohibition theretofore issued against the defendants for the purpose of prohibiting them from prosecuting the plaintiffs under the so-called Sunday Closing Law, Section 103-53-1 and 2, R. S. U. 1933, now Sec. 103-53-1 and 2, U. C. A. 1943.

The appellants, hereafter called plaintiffs, are copartners and operate places of business at Price and Helper, Utah, under the name of the Carbon Fruit Markets. They were tried and convicted by the Justice of the Peace in Price for violating the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Atwood v. Cox, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. Karmil Merchandising Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
  4. Davis v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API