Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Sumida

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1918No. Crim. No. 2121PublishedCited by 46 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Frank Kauke, for Petitioner.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The petitioner by means of this application seeks a decision of this court declaring that a certain ordinance of the town of Fowler is invalid. Fowler is a town of the sixth class. The ordinance purports to forbid the carrying on of certain occupations within said town on Sundays. Section 1 is as follows:

“That it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or association to keep open within the corporate limits of the town of Fowler, upon or on any Sunday, any store, workshop, banking house or other place of business or any public dance hall, pool or billiard hall, skating rink,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ex parte NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API