Daniel v. Board of Police Commissioners
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.
By stipulation the above entitled actions were consolidated for trial. The plaintiffs in those actions, as taxpayers, sought to enjoin the defendants from using public funds to administer or execute the provisions of section 103.102 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. The alleged basis for seeking the injunction was that the section, on its face, is unconstitutional. In the Daniel ease, the plaintiffs also alleged that sections 103.29 and 103.31, as applied to said section 103.102, are unconstitutional, and that the unconstitutionality appears on the face of each section. In each action the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Ex parte TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. LoignonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Burton v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Crownover v. MusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Robins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- City of Oakland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.