Ex parte Whitwell
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for a discharge from imprisonment upon a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haver, J.
— This is a proceeding upon habeas corpus, and it appears from the return to the writ issued herein, that at the date of its service the petitioner was imprisoned by the sheriff of San Mateo County upon a charge of maintaining within *76that county a hospital for the treatment, for reward, of insane persons, without having procured a license so to do, as required by an ordinance adopted by its board of supervisors March 16, 1892. The ordinance referred to purports to be one “to license for purposes of regulation and revenue the business of keeping .... within the county of San Mateo ....…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Ex parte TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ex parte Sing LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Koch v. Branch & CrookesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- De Mill v. MoffatMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ex Parte Quong WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.