Clemons v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
This action for declaratory and injunctive relief was brought to test the validity of an ordinance of the city of Los Angeles limiting the subdivision of property to certain minimum lot requirements. The trial court held that the ordinance was “constitutional, valid and enforceable,” and that certain transactions concluded by plaintiff in violation thereof were “null and void.” The propriety of such adjudication cannot be successfully assailed in the light of settled legal principles.
It appears from the agreed statement of facts that within two years prior to the commencement of this action…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.