Legal Opinion
Contreras v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 31, 2005No. 04-941CPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
On June 1, 2004, the plaintiffs Miguel A. Contreras, Jorge Balderrama and Anita Trujillo (“plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of Hispanic Customs Service Criminal Investigator Special Agents, filed the instant action seeking money damages from the defendant United States (“government”). On June 22, 2004, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint (“Am.Compl.”) and an amended motion for class certification.
This case is currently before the Court on the government’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Greene v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Stanwyck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- White & Case LLP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- West Bay Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.