Legal Opinion

Curry v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 8, 2005No. 02-101CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WOLSKI, Judge.

The plaintiffs Thelma M. Curry and Yolanda Quimby, current and former employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Administration (“VHA”), seek on behalf of themselves, and all similarly-situated plaintiffs, back payments for “additional pay” for regularly scheduled night and weekend work during authorized, paid periods of military leave, court leave, annual leave and sick leave. The parties agreed to defer the issue of class certification until after the liability issues were considered on motions for summary judgment. Each side has so moved. For the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Rotech Healthcare Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Athey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Quimby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API