Legal Opinion

Stanwyck v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 5, 2016No. 15-28CPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to dismiss,'RCFC 12(b)(1); bankruptcy trustee bonds, 11 U.S.C. § 322; no contract based on statutes and regulations; no jurisdiction over criminal matters; Joshua v. United States; RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.; no money-mandating laws identified.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VICTOR J. WOLSKI, Judge

Pending before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss this case. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that it lacks jurisdiction over plaintiffs claims. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the case is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Steven J. Stanwyck1 was a debtor in three Chapter 7…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Baistar Mechanical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Akbar v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. American Ground Transportation, Inc.United States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
  5. Barth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API