Legal Opinion

Hartung v. Billmeier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 1954No. 36,333PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

In July 1945 defendant commenced working for plaintiff in the latter’s garage. In the early part of August of the same year plaintiff said to the defendant and other employees:

“You boys stick with me for five years and I mil give you a Jmndred dollars a year bonus.” (Italics supplied.)

Defendant thereafter worked continuously for plaintiff in the garage until April 1950 when plaintiff transferred him to a bulk oil station where his employment continued until April 1952…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Scott v. J. F. Duthie & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Twohy v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  4. Ames-Brooks Co. v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. La Du-King Manufacturing Co. v. La DuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API