Legal Opinion

McGrath v. Rhode Island Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 9, 1996No. 95-2301PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to determine whether a legislated change to a substantive provision of a public employees’ retirement plan, as applied, transgresses the Contracts Clause of the United States Constitution. We find no constitutional infraction: plaintiff-appellant Thomas McGrath’s pension rights had not yet vested when the modification occurred, and the state had reserved the power to alter or revoke its promise of retirement benefits to municipal employees at the time it established the plan in which McGrath later became a participant. Consequently, we affirm the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Houlton Citizens' Coalition v. Town of HoultonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. Parella v. Retirement Board of the Rhode Island Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Alliance of Auto. Mfrs. v. GwadoskyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. Parker v. WakelinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. PatchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API