Legal Opinion
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 16, 1983No. C1-83-152, C8-83-164, C1-83-166, C3-83-167 and C5-83-168PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
This litigation challenges the validity of legislation passed by the Minnesota Legislature on December 10, 1982, and signed into law by Governor Albert H. Quie on December 13,1982. Act of December 10,1982, 3rd Spec.Sess. ch. 1, 1982 Minn.Sess. Law Serv. 1819 (the “Act”). On that same day, various parties, representing public employees affected by the terms of the Act, petitioned this court for a writ of quo warranto in an effort to prevent the enforcement of the Act. Finding that this case did not present the type of controversy which fits within the nature of quo…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.