Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1954No. Appeal, No. 104PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

On May 10, 1910, Thomas W. Hickey, being then less than 28 years of age, entered the employment of the City of Pittsburgh. Five years later the Legisla*302ture of Pennsylvania enacted a law, Section 3 of which reads: “Every person now or hereafter employed by the said cities, as herein provided, if any, of the age of sixty years and upwards, who shall have been so employed for a period of twenty years or more, shall, upon application to the board of pensions herein created, be retired from service, and shall during the remainder of his or her life receive the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Busser v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. McBride v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Baker v. Retirement Bd. of Allegheny Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Miller v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Bayrón Toro v. SerraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  5. Harvey v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API