Legal Opinion
Edgerton Independent Consolidated School District No. 2 v. Volz
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1926No. File No. 5706PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.
Plaintiff is a consolidated school district of Hanson county. Defendant Volz was its treasurer. The Western Surety Company was the surety on his official bond. On January 25. 1924, the Farmers’ & Merchants’ State Bank of Farmer, S. D., which had complied with the Depositors’ Guaranty Fund Law, suspended and was taken over by the superintendent of banks, *110and is in process of liquidation. O'n that day Volz, in his name as such treasurer, had on deposit in said bank funds of plaintiff in the sum of $8,320.26. This action was brought to recover said sum from the treasurer and his 'bondsman.' The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perley v. County of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- In re State Treasurer's SettlementNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Gress v. EvansSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1877
- City of Livingston v. WoodsMontana Supreme Court · 1897
- Board of Education v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Independent School Dist. v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Independent School Dist. v. FlittieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Wessington Springs v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Board of Education of the Independent School District v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Thunder Hawk School Dist. v. Western Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.