Legal Opinion

Mendez v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 5, 2002No. 2 CA-SA 01-0117PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Jesus Mendez challenges the respondent judge’s order in the underlying criminal proceeding, entered pursuant to Rule 7.4(b), Ariz. R.Crim. P., 16A A.R.S., denying Mendez’s request to be released on his own recognizance and confirming the release bond amount previously set at $250,000. Mendez has no equally plain, speedy, or adequate remedy by appeal because the order from which he seeks relief is interlocutory. See Ariz. R.P. Special Actions 1(a), 17B A.R.S.; see also Nalbandian v. Superior Court, 163 Ariz. 126, 786 P.2d 977…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nalbandian v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Lewis v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court of City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. State v. GroundsArizona Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. State v. FERNANDO A.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Potter v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. Ruiz v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API