Legal Opinion

Arizona Department of Revenue v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 18, 1997No. 1 CA-SA 96-0275PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

This special action arises from a tax court ruling that an Arizona Department of Revenue employee was subject to the “one independent [expert] witness” presumption. Petitioners Arizona Department of Revenue (the department) and Pinal and Gila counties request relief from a pre-trial ruling made pursuant to Ariz. R. Civ. P. 43(g) [Rule 43(g) ]. Amended in 1991 as part of a set of litigation reforms, Rule 43(g) presumptively limits independent expert witnesses to one witness per issue per side.

We now clarify the meaning of “independent [expert] witness” and grant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. King v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. State v. Old West Bonding Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Felipe v. Theme Tech Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. Mendez v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. Rodriguez v. ArellanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API