Arizona Department of Revenue v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
This special action arises from a tax court ruling that an Arizona Department of Revenue employee was subject to the “one independent [expert] witness” presumption. Petitioners Arizona Department of Revenue (the department) and Pinal and Gila counties request relief from a pre-trial ruling made pursuant to Ariz. R. Civ. P. 43(g) [Rule 43(g) ]. Amended in 1991 as part of a set of litigation reforms, Rule 43(g) presumptively limits independent expert witnesses to one witness per issue per side.
We now clarify the meaning of “independent [expert] witness” and grant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- King v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State v. Old West Bonding Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Felipe v. Theme Tech Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Mendez v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Rodriguez v. ArellanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.