Legal Opinion

Nalbandian v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 27, 1989No. 1 CA-SA 88-160, 1 CA-CR 88-760PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

This case involves whether a defendant is entitled to an interlocutory appeal when a plea of double jeopardy is raised. James Peter Nalbandian (defendant) appealed from the trial court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict of not guilty “pursuant to Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977).” The trial court refused to recognize his notice of appeal and proceeded to set a firm trial date. Defendant filed a special action petition challenging only the trial court’s refusal to enter a stay of the proceedings, contending…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Coy v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. People v. TorresMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. BarancoHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API