State v. Grounds
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
We accepted jurisdiction of this petition for special action to decide whether the trial judge abused his discretion in ordering the state to reveal an informant’s name and address to defense counsel. Ariz.Const. art. 6, § 5(4); 17A A.R.S. Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, rule 3(c). Answering in the affirmative, this case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The real party in interest herein, Linda Sue Budwit, has been charged with three counts of sale of a narcotic drug (cocaine), valued at not less than $250. In order to substantiate an entrapment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. BengeArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. TuellArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. AltamiranoArizona Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Mendez v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. RiddelArizona Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.