Legal Opinion

State v. Grounds

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1981No. 15093PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

We accepted jurisdiction of this petition for special action to decide whether the trial judge abused his discretion in ordering the state to reveal an informant’s name and address to defense counsel. Ariz.Const. art. 6, § 5(4); 17A A.R.S. Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, rule 3(c). Answering in the affirmative, this case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The real party in interest herein, Linda Sue Budwit, has been charged with three counts of sale of a narcotic drug (cocaine), valued at not less than $250. In order to substantiate an entrapment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. BengeArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. TuellArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. AltamiranoArizona Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Mendez v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. State v. FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Collins v. RiddelArizona Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API