Legal Opinion
ChartOne, Inc. v. Bernini
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 6, 2004No. 2 CA-SA 2003-0107, 2 CA-SA 2003-0108PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 In these consolidated special actions, petitioners ChartOne, Inc. and Smart Professional Photocopy Corporation (collectively, defendants) ask us to determine the scope of a trial court’s authority under article VI, § 24 of the Arizona Constitution and Rule 53, Ariz. R. Civ. P., 16 A.R.S., Pt. 1, to appoint a special master. Specifically, the primary issue in this case is whether a trial court may, in the absence of an agreement by the parties, appoint a special master to calculate a plaintiffs damages after a jury has found the defendant liable on the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Twin City Fire Insurance v. BurkeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Ford v. ChartOne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Day v. LSI Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.