Locke v. Meline
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
This action was instituted by Benjamin F. Locke, now deceased. Appellant as administratrix of his estate has been substituted in his place. The complaint contained three causes of action, but was actually tried on the first, which was a cause of action based on a' written contract made with Locke by defendants to pay him a sum *483of money in return for certain services. The answer of defendants to the first cause of action denied all of its material allegations and set up separate defenses based upon the statute of limitations and the statute of frauds. The action was tried…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Card v. BomsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Reinders v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Hansen v. Fresno Jersey Farm Dairy Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Landers v. Crescent Creamery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- Owens v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Page v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Myers v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Locke v. MelineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935