Legal Opinion

Reinders v. Olsen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1923No. Civ. No. 4085PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles Monroe, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Plaintiff, by his guardian, brought action against defendant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between a motorcycle upon which plaintiff was riding and an automobile operated by defendant. The principal undisputed facts appear to be as follows: At about 8 o’clock P. M. of August 27, 1920, plaintiff was riding his motorcycle eastward on Third Street in the city of San Pedro, approaching the intersection of Third Street with Bandini Street, the former extending east and west and the latter north and south, the two streets intersecting at right angles. A single…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hurtel v. Albert Cohn, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Shannon v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. WusichArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Brawthen v. H & R BLOCK, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Solko v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API