Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Fresno Jersey Farm Dairy Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1934No. Docket No. L.A. 14459PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Cross-appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for damages for breach of contract.

On April 1, 1930, the parties entered into a written agreement for the sale and delivery by the plaintiff to the defendant of approximately eighty gallons of milk daily f. o. b. Fresno. The defendant agreed to pay for butter fat content of the milk at eighty-five cents per pound for all milk less two cents to cover costs of hauling for each gallon of milk shipped. That price was referred to in the contract as the basic price. Payments for milk delivered were to be made monthly on the fifteenth of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. California Bean Growers' Ass'n v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Zinn v. Fred R. Bright Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Kinkle v. Fruit Growers Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Wallace v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Martini E Ricci Lamino S.P.A.-Consortile Societa Agricola v. Trinity Fruit Sales Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API