Landers v. Crescent Creamery Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
Two separate actions for damages were consolidated for trial. The injuries sustained by the plaintiffs were the result of a collision between a motorcycle on which the two plaintiffs were riding and a truck operated by the defendant Marsh Noe as the agent of the Crescent Creamery Company. At the conclusion of the evidence and before the case was submitted to the jury, the defendants moved for directed verdicts, which motions were denied, and the cases were submitted. The jury rendered verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs, and against the defendants, with damages assessed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Newson v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Reinders v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shannon v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Page v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Tracey v. L. A. Paying Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Locke v. MelineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Myers v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.