Legal Opinion

Locke v. Meline

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1935No. Civ. 7966Published

1Opinion of the Court

8 Cal.App.2d 482 (1935)

APPLEWITE S. LOCKE, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant,

v.

FRANK L. MELINE et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 7966.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division One.

July 23, 1935.

Thomas H. Hearn for Appellant.

Walter H. Hewicker for Respondents.

Roth, J., pro tem.

This action was instituted by Benjamin F. Locke, now deceased. Appellant as administratrix of his estate has been substituted in his place. The complaint contained three causes of action, but was actually tried on the first, which was a cause of action based on a written contract made with Locke by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Card v. BomsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Reinders v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Hansen v. Fresno Jersey Farm Dairy Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Locke v. MelineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API