Legal Opinion
Owens v. Noble
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1946No. Civ. 7267PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
The complaint in this action was stated in two counts, but was tried upon the first one only. It was alleged in said first count that the defendant Westover Company is a corporation; that on or about March 1, 1938, plaintiff and defendant corporation, acting through defendant B. B. Noble, orally formed a partnership for the purpose of buying, running and selling cattle; that by the terms of said partnership agreement the Westover Company was to purchase livestock, and plaintiff was to devote his time to the management of the partnership affairs, and the partners were to share equally in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lapp-Gifford Co. v. Muscoy Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Work v. Associated Almond Growers of Paso RoblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Hansen v. Fresno Jersey Farm Dairy Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Biaggi v. SawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
- Conderback, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Walton v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Ramos v. City of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Mears v. JeffryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.