Legal Opinion

Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1930No. Docket No. Sac. 4318PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYLER, J., pro t em.

Action for damages for breach of contract.

The complaint counts upon an agreement entered into between the parties relating to the farming of certain lands owned by plaintiffs. The instrument is of some length and is pleaded in haec verba in the complaint. Prior to the time of its execution plaintiffs had been the owners of an undivided one-half interest in three parcels of real property near Oroville, California. Parcel 1 consisted of 320 acres, and was known as the “Adobe Ranch”; parcel 2 consisted of 157 acres, known as the “Home Place,” and parcel 3 consisted of about…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Umsted v. Scofield Engineering Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. MacDermot v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Newson v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. National Bank of Cleburne v. M. M. Pittman Roller MillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API