Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Abels

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1939No. Civ. 12155PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrail, P. J.

—This is an appeal from a judgment against the plaintiffs upon their own motion for a judgment upon the pleadings, which motion was joined in by the defendant. The action was under section 3412 of the Civil Code of California for the purpose of setting aside and declaring of no effect three instruments—a trustee in bankruptcy’s deed, a declaration of ownership under said deed and a claim of a judgment lien. The question for this court to determine on appeal is whether the answer set up any valid defense.

“A motion for judgment on the pleadings is in the nature of a demurrer. It is in substance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McGowan v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Cuneo v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Neale v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Coe v. BennettIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Stilwell v. TrutanichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Chao Fu, Inc. v. Wen Ching ChenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Barasch v. EpsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API