Legal Opinion

Neale v. Morrow

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1916No. S. F. No. 7034PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal upon the granting of defendant’s motion for a.nonsuit. The action is a revival of one to recover judgment upon a promissory note which was the subject of consideration by this court in Neale v. Head, 133. Cal. 42, [65 Pac. 131, 576], (See, also, Neale v. Morrow, 150 Cal. 414, [88 Pac. 815], and Neale v. Morrow, 163 Cal. 445, [125 Pac. 1052].) In the case reported in Neale v. Head, 133 Cal. 42, [65 Pac. 131, 576], a judgment rendered in plaintiff’s favor and an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial were reversed. Following the last…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Haviland v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. EdmundsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Morrow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Douglas v. JanisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Cuneo v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Cohn v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. People v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API