McGowan v. Ford
California Supreme Court
Appeals from two judgments of the Superior Court of Mendocino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
There are two appeals in this case, and two separate transcripts are presented, but the questions involved may properly be considered together.
The respondents made application to the court below for a writ of mandate to compel the appellant, as treasurer of Mendocino county, to pay two warrants drawn on him by the county auditor.
*179The material facts stated in the petition are as follows:
On July 11, 1893, the county of Mendocino was justly indebted to respondents in the sum of $4,545.27 for work and labor done and performed by them under contract with said county in repairing the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ward v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- San Francisco Gas Co. v. BrickwedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Schwartz v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People ex rel. Atkinson v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Fleming v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by25 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- In Re Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Arthur v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.