Legal Opinion

Coe v. Bennett

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, J.

This appears to be a summary proceeding for unlawful detainer as defined by C. S., sec. 7322. Appellant Roy EL Bennett claims a right to the property described in the -complaint as successor in interest of one Bauchman, who entered into a written agreement with respondents to purchase the premises in August, 1919, Thereafter Bauchman assigned his contract of purchase to Bennett, and appellant King, having leased the premises from Bennett, was in possession at the time of commencement of the action.

The complaint also alleges facts that indicate intent on the part of respondents to state a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hunter v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Francis v. West Virginia Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Davenport v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ben Lomond Wine Co. v. SladkyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Johnson v. ChelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  2. Mecham v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Cedarholm v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INS. COMPANIESIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Pearson v. HarperIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ott v. KellerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API