Bradford Investment Co. v. Joost
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Chipman, C.
This is an action to foreclose fifty bonds of a railway company, of the par value of one thousand dollars each, exclusive of coupons, and to have the proceeds, after judicial sale, applied to the payment of a certain promissory note made to plaintiff by Behrend Joost, the appealing defendant, for twenty-five thousand dollars. An agreement was made by defendant Joost that the bonds might be sold for payment of the note, and plaintiff’s right to a judicial foreclosure is not denied, but the right to a personal judgment against defendant for a deficiency, if any there be, is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Vassault v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Smith v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Hill v. BadeljyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Alaska Salmon Co. v. Standard Box Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Armington v. StelleMontana Supreme Court · 1902
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.